城市群空间功能分工带来了资源配置效率提升吗?——基于中国城市面板数据经验研究Does the Spatial Function Division of Urban Agglomeration Improve the Efficiency of Resource Allocation?Empirical Study Based on the Panel Data of Cities in China
刘胜;
摘要(Abstract):
加强城市间功能分工协作,提高城市群资源配置效率,对促进城市群高质量发展至关重要。基于资源配置效率视角,文章利用中国工业企业和城市面板匹配数据,考察了城市群空间功能分工对资源配置效率的影响效应及其作用机制。结果表明:城市群空间功能分工有利于提高其资源配置效率,此结论在进行一系列稳健性检验后保持不变。并且,城市群空间功能分工对资源配置效率的作用效果要受企业特征与区域特征差异的影响。进一步研究表明,城市群空间功能分工主要通过削弱"行政区划壁垒"与强化"产城融合效应"来提高其资源配置效率。该结论对构建城市间协调发展新格局、促进城市群健康有序发展具有重要意义。
关键词(KeyWords): 城市群;空间功能分工;资源配置效率
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“生产性服务业与制造业协同集聚驱动全球价值链演化的机理与路径”(71803033);; 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“全球价值链分工视阈下中国城市生产性服务业空间发展模式及溢出效应研究”(18YJC790101);; 广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划2018年度课题“广州建设实体经济、科技创新、现代金融、人力资源协同发展的产业体系研究”(2018GZQN25);“广深科技创新走廊视野下价值创新园区发展研究”(2018GZQN10);; 广东外语外贸大学粤港澳大湾区研究院2018年资助课题“粤港澳大湾区推动区域经济一体化的协调机制体系研究”
作者(Author): 刘胜;
Email:
DOI: 10.16537/j.cnki.jynufe.000404
参考文献(References):
- [1] Hsieh C T,Klenow P J. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009,124(4):1403-1448.
- [2] Dollar D,Wei S. Das(Wasted)Kapital:Firm Ownership and Investment Efficiency in China[R]. NBER Working Paper,2007.
- [3]张建华,邹凤明.资源错配对经济增长的影响及其机制研究进展[J].经济学动态,2015,(1):122-136.
- [4] Alder S D. In the Wrong Hands:Complementarities,Resource Allocation,and TFP[J]. American Economic Journal:Macroeconomics,2016,8(1):199-241.
- [5] Kogan L,Papanikolaou D,Seru A,Stoffman Net al. Technological Innovation,Resource Allocation,and Growth[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2017,132(2):665-712.
- [6] Camagni R,Capello R,Caragliu Aet al,Static vs. Dynamic Agglomeration Economies:Spatial Context and Structural Evolution Behind Urban Growth[M]//Seminal Studies in Regional and Urban Economics. Springer,2017:227-259.
- [7] Kahn M E. Agglomeration Economics:New Evidence on Trends in the Cost of Urban Agglomeration[M].The University of Chicago Press,2010:339-354.
- [8] Mera K. On the Urban Agglomeration and Economic Efficiency[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1973,21(2):309-324.
- [9] Mills E S. An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in a Metropolitan Area[J]. The American Economic Review,1967,57(2):197-210.
- [10] Hartwick P G,Hartwick J M. Efficient Resource Allocation in a Multinucleated City with Intermediate Goods[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1974,88(2):340-352.
- [11] Arnott R J. Efficient Metropolitan Resource Allocation[R]. SPP Research Paper,2016,9(18).
- [12]刘汉初,卢明华.中国城市专业化发展变化及分析[J].世界地理研究,2014,23(4):85-96.
- [13] Nakamura R. Agglomeration Economies in Urban Manufacturing Industries:A Case of Japanese Cities[J].Journal of Urban Economics,1985,17(1):108-124.
- [14] Wheeler C H. Search,Sorting,and Urban Agglomeration[J]. Journal of Labor Economics,2001,19(4):879-899.
- [15] Helsley R W,Strange W C. Matching and Agglomeration Economies in a System of Cities[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,1990,20(2):189-212.
- [16] Combes P P,Duranton G,Gobillon L,Puga D,Roux Set al. The Productivity Advantages of Large Cities:Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection[J]. Econometrica,2012,80(6):2543-2594.
- [17] Van Oort F. On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm:Spatial Integration,Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad[J]. Urban Studies,2010,47:725-748.
- [18] Fitjar R D,Rodríguez-Pose A. When Local Interaction Does Not Suffice:Sources of Firm Innovation in Urban Norway[R]. Environment and Planning A,2011,43(6):1248-1267.
- [19] Kloosterman R C,Lambregts B. Clustering of Economic Activities in Polycentric Urban Regions:The Case of the Randstad[J]. Urban Studies,2001,38(4):717-732.
- [20] Fan C C,Scott A J. Industrial Agglomeration and Development:A Survey of Spatial Economic Issues in East Asia and a Statistical Analysis of Chinese Regions[J]. Economic Geography,2003,79(3):295-319.
- [21] Ellison G,Glaeser E L,Kerr W R. What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns[J]. American Economic Review,2010,100(3):1195-1213.
- [22] Guerrieri P,Meliciani V. Technology and International Competitiveness:The Interdependence Between Manufacturing and Producer Services[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2005,16(4):489-502.
- [23] Francois J,Woerz J. Producer Services,Manufacturing Linkages,and Trade[J]. Journal of Industry,Competition and Trade,2008,8(3-4):199-229.
- [24] Liang X. Outward Internationalization of Private Enterprises in China:The Effect of Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to Home Market Rivals[J]. Journal of World Business,2012,47(1):134-144.
- [25]刘贯春,陈登科,丰超.最低工资标准的资源错配效应及其作用机制分析[J].中国工业经济,2017,(7):62-80.
- [26] Bade F J,Laaser C F,Soltwedel R. Urban Specialization in the Internet Age:Empirical Findings for Germany[R]. Kiel Working Paper,2004.
- [27] Duranton G,Overman H G. Testing for Localization Using Micro-geographic Data[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2005,72(4):1077-1106.
- [28]顾乃华.生产性服务业对工业获利能力的影响和渠道——基于城市面板数据和SFA模型的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2010,(5):48-58.
- [29] Cai H,Liu Q. Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance:Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms[J]. The Economic Journal,2009,119(537):764-795.
- [30]刘修岩,李松林,陈子扬.多中心空间发展模式与地区收入差距[J].中国工业经济,2017,(10):25-43.
- [31]丛海彬,段巍,吴福象.新型城镇化中的产城融合及其福利效应[J].中国工业经济,2017,(11):62-80.
- (1)对“行政区划壁垒”指标的衡量,借鉴刘修岩等(2017)文献,以地方政府财政支出占GDP之比衡量地方政府财政规模这一“有形”之手对经济的干预程度。当干预倾向越强时,地方政府为保证雄厚的财力而可能会有较为强烈的地方保护主义倾向,进而可能会对资本等要素跨区域自由流动做出显性或隐性的限制。对“产城融合”指标的衡量,借鉴丛海彬等(2017)的文献,从人本导向、产业支撑和功能匹配三方面选取细化指标并采用熵值法和耦合协调度进行合成。数据主要来自刘修岩等(2017)与丛海彬等(2017),参见《中国工业经济》网站(http://www.ciejournal.org)。